A Scoping Review of the Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Main Article Content
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, clinical decision support, patient outcomes, COVID-19, intensive care unit
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been increasingly instrumental in reshaping the intensive care unit (ICU) landscape. This paper highlights the importance of CDSS in improving healthcare professionals' decision-making processes by examining their numerous contributions to the management of critically ill patients.
This scoping review comprised information concerning the role of CDSS in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons for the future of public health care (PHC). The identified literature was published during the COVID-19 peak years (2019–2023), retrieved from the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Scopus. A set of predefined inclusion criteria were used, then thematic analysis was applied. The reporting followed the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews.
A total of 9 studies were included in the final synthesis (all articles). These studies examined various aspects of the role of CDSS in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping review was comprehensive and focused on the emerging topic of discussion but lacked risk of bias assessment.
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic's unparalleled obstacles, CDSS in ICUs became a vital resource for medical professionals. These technologies help physicians diagnose, treat, and manage COVID-19 patients by using innovative algorithms and real-time data analytics. Early identification, monitoring, timely alarms, and insights into patients' changing clinical status are some of the most crucial functions of CDSS. This capacity was vital in quickly recognising conditions that were getting worse, facilitating quick action, and enhancing patient outcomes.
Additionally, CDSS in ICUs proved effective in therapy guiding, providing evidence-based suggestions for therapeutic approaches. Through the integration of patient information, test findings, and established procedures, these systems enabled tailored and efficient treatment, guaranteeing that medical interventions corresponded with the dynamic course of the illness. Moreover, CDSS helped with risk classification, which enabled medical practitioners to carefully manage resource allocation and customise interventions based on the unique profiles of each patient.
Through the reduction of errors and improvement of patient safety, CDSS was significant in the field of drug management. These technologies met the vital requirement for accuracy in COVID-19 patient care by providing notifications for drug interactions, dosage modifications, and medication administration.
The extensive capabilities that were required in the ICU highlight the revolutionary influence on healthcare delivery that CDSS have. CDSS was invaluable in navigating the challenges of caring critically sick patients in the demanding setting of the global health crisis by integrating evidence-based practices, optimising resource utilisation, and offering real-time decision support.
References
2. Laxar D, Eitenberger M, Maleczek M, Kaider A, Hammerle FP, Kimberger O. The influence of explainable vs non-explainable clinical decision support systems on rapid triage decisions: a mixed methods study. BMC Medicine. 2023;21(1):359.
3. Chen Z, Liang N, Zhang H, et al. Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities. Open Heart. 2023;10(2).
4. Safdari R, Rezayi S, Saeedi S, Tanhapour M, Gholamzadeh M. Using data mining techniques to fight and control epidemics: A scoping review. Health Technol (Berl). 2021:1-13.
5. Souza-Pereira L, Pombo N, Ouhbi S, Felizardo V, Garcia N. Clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: A Systematic literature review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2020;195:105565.
6. Karthikeyan A, Garg A, Vinod PK, Priyakumar UD. Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support System for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021;9(475).
7. Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:17.
8. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32.
9. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119-2126.
10. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.
11. Khalil H, Peters MDJ, Tricco AC, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;130:156-160.
12. Martín-Lázaro J, Kelly J, Álamo P. Clinical Decision Support Systems in Critical Care during Covid-19. Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. 2021;Clinical Medical Reviews & Reports:64.
13. Deif MA, Solyman AAA, Alsharif MH, Uthansakul P. Automated Triage System for Intensive Care Admissions during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Hybrid XGBoost-AHP Approach. Sensors. 2021;21(19):6379.
14. Jansson M, Rubio J, Gavaldà R, Rello J. Artificial Intelligence for clinical decision support in Critical Care, required and accelerated by COVID-19. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;39(6):691-693.
15. Murri R, Masciocchi C, Lenkowicz J, et al. A real-time integrated framework to support clinical decision making for covid-19 patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2022;217:106655.
16. Shah S, Switzer S, Shippee ND, et al. Implementation of an Anticoagulation Practice Guideline for COVID-19 via a Clinical Decision Support System in a Large Academic Health System and Its Evaluation: Observational Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(11):e30743.
17. Moulaei K, Bahaadinbeigy K. Diagnosing, Managing, and Controlling COVID-19 using Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Study to Introduce CDSS Applications. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022;12(2):213-224.
18. Ameri A, Ameri A, Salmanizadeh F, Bahaadinbeigy K. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in assistance to COVID-19 diagnosis: A scoping review on types and evaluation methods. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(2):e1919.
19. Kim S, Kim EH, Kim HS. Physician Knowledge Base: Clinical Decision Support Systems. Yonsei Med J. 2022;63(1):8-15.
20. McRae MP, Dapkins IP, Sharif I, et al. Managing COVID-19 With a Clinical Decision Support Tool in a Community Health Network: Algorithm Development and Validation. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e22033.
21. McRae MP, Simmons GW, Christodoulides NJ, et al. Clinical decision support tool and rapid point-of-care platform for determining disease severity in patients with COVID-19. Lab on a Chip. 2020;20(12):2075-2085.
22. Wu G, Yang P, Xie Y, et al. Development of a Clinical Decision Support System for Severity Risk Prediction and Triage of COVID-19 Patients at Hospital Admission: an International Multicenter Study. European Respiratory Journal. 2020:2001104.
23. Goldstein BA, Cerullo M, Krishnamoorthy V, et al. Development and Performance of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Inform Resource Utilization for Elective Operations. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(11):e2023547-e2023547.
24. Debnath S, Barnaby DP, Coppa K, et al. Machine learning to assist clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bioelectronic Medicine. 2020;6(1):14.
25. Flores E, Salinas JM, Blasco Á, et al. Clinical Decision Support systems: A step forward in establishing the clinical laboratory as a decision maker hub - A CDS system protocol implementation in the clinical laboratory. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2023;22:27-31.
26. Hak F, Guimarães T, Santos M. Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0272846.
27. Guangyao W, Pei Y, Yuanliang X, et al. Development of a Clinical Decision Support System for Severity Risk Prediction and Triage of COVID-19 Patients at Hospital Admission: an International Multicenter Study. European Respiratory Journal. 2020:2001104.
28. Leal JE. AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX. 2020;7:100748.
29. As I, Basu P, Talwar P. Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning and Design. In: As I, Basu P, Talwar P, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning and Design. Elsevier; 2022:381-385.
30. Pawson R, Manzano-Santaella A. A realist diagnostic workshop. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):176-191.
31. Pawson R, Tilley N, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. sage; 1997.
32. De Weger E, Van Vooren NJE, Wong G, et al. What’s in a Realist Configuration? Deciding Which Causal Configurations to Use, How, and Why. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020;19:1609406920938577.
33. Bouamrane M-M, Mair FS. A study of general practitioners’ perspectives on electronic medical records systems in NHSScotland. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2013;13(1):58.
34. Jeffries M, Salema NE, Laing L, et al. The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250946.
35. Patel R, Green W, Shahzad MW, Larkin C. Use of Mobile Clinical Decision Support Software by Junior Doctors at a UK Teaching Hospital: Identification and Evaluation of Barriers to Engagement. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(3):e80.
36. Cresswell KM, Lee L, Slee A, Coleman J, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Qualitative analysis of vendor discussions on the procurement of Computerised Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support systems in hospitals. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008313.
37. Al-Garni BM. Analysis and Review of Prescribing Clinical Decision Support System within the Context of Nhs Secondary Sector. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences. 2018;4(3):60-71.