Thank you for your willingness to review an article for the BAVARIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES. Your efforts and expertise are an invaluable contribution to the success of DIT’s academic journal, especially during the current foundation phase. It is our goal to establish the BAVARIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES as a citeable academic journal which is recognized in the scientific community. Your critical reviews and constructive feedback are highly valued!
The review process itself is analogous to that of other scientific journals. In addition to the free report we would like to kindly ask you to use the outline mentioned below.
- Relationship to Literature
- Implications for research, practice and/or society
- Quality of communication
Does the paper contain new and significant information adequate to justify publication?
2. Relationship to Literature
Does the paper demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources? Is any significant work ignored?
Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts, or other ideas? Has the research or equivalent intellectual work on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods employed appropriate?
Are results presented clearly and analyzed appropriately? Do the conclusions adequately tie together the other elements of the paper?
5. Implications for research, practice and/or society
Does the paper identify clearly any implications for research, practice and/or society? Does the paper bridge the gap between theory and practice? How can the research be used in practice (economic and commercial impact), in teaching, to influence public policy, in research (contributing to the body of knowledge)? What is the impact upon society (influencing public attitudes, affecting quality of life)? Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions of the paper?
6. Quality of Communication
Does the paper clearly express its case, measured against the technical language of the field and the expected knowledge of the journal's readership? Has attention been paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure, jargon use, acronyms, etc.